Breaking Bread: The Emergence of Eucharist and Agape in Early Christian Communities
Digital Verbum Edition
Overview
What’s the difference between eucharist and agape? And how did each come to be?
The liturgies of early Christians are often obscure and variegated in the historical record. This is especially true of the eucharist, where the basic practice of communal eating is difficult to disentangle from other contemporary meals, whether Greco-Roman or Jewish practices—or the ill-defined agape meal.
In Breaking Bread, Alistair C. Stewart cuts through scholarly confusion about early Christian eating. Stewart pinpoints the split in agape and eucharist to the shift in celebrating the eucharist on Sunday morning, leading to the inception of agape as an evening meal. The former sought divine union, the latter, communal harmony. In the final chapter he explores a breadth of Syriac, Greek, and Latin primary sources on a variety of local eucharistic traditions, tracing their development into the familiar prayers and distribution of token amounts of bread and wine, which emerged in the third century.
Nuanced and well-researched, Breaking Bread clarifies the development of the blessed sacrament and its lesser-known counterpart. Theologians and historians of early Christianity will find Stewart’s work foundational in approaching a topic of enduring scholarly interest but elusive consensus.
This is a Logos Reader Edition. Learn more.
- Pinpoints the split in agape and eucharist to the shift in celebrating the eucharist on Sunday morning
- Explores a breadth of Syriac, Greek, and Latin primary sources on a variety of local eucharistic traditions
- Clarifies the development of the blessed sacrament and its lesser-known counterpart
- Preface
- Introduction
- 1. Saturday night and Sunday morning
- 2. From eucharist to agapē
- 3. Changing course
- 4. Two roots or a tangled mess?
- Conclusions: Historical, Theological and Pastoral
Although in the past Alistair and I have usually found ourselves on opposite sides of debates about early Christian worship, his latest book evokes nothing but praise from me for its comprehensive and highly detailed approach to the subject.
—Paul F. Bradshaw, University of Notre Dame
Alistair Stewart’s work is always rigorous as well as creative, and the deployment of his acute interpretive skills to the question of eucharistic origins in such a thorough way as this is very welcome. Even where we disagree, his probing analysis does not fail to shed new light, and this account will now be a necessary point of reference for the topic.
—Andrew McGowan, Yale Divinity School
This refreshing work bears all the hallmarks of Alistair Stewart’s impressive scholarship: attention to detail, comprehensive knowledge of the textual evidence, a critical stance toward previous scholarly conclusions, including his own, and the capacity to steer honest lines through the complexity and obscurity of the material. Thus he builds on an emerging consensus of multiple meal rites in early Christianity, with multiple roots contributing to what eventually became the eucharistic sacrifice, and offers good reasons for eschewing attempts to recreate early Christian practice in present parishes.
—Frances Young, University of Birmingham